Site Meter

4.7 earthquake creates tension across Southern California

Consequence of the 4.7 earthquake

Consequence of the 4.7 earthquake

The disturbing quake occurred around 8:40 p.m. on May, 17 and created quite some damage across Southern Cali. The 4.7 seism struck southeast of Los Angeles International Airport, just 3 miles from the South Bay community of Lennox. It was followed by a 3.1 a few minutes later.

According to the U.S. Geological Survey, the initial point of origin was 8.4 miles below the surface. Although there were no serious damages, residents in the Lennox area reported serious shaking of their homes, accompanied with dishes falling off shelves. It seems that the Newport-Inglewood fault may have caused the quake but no official data has been released.

Spokesman Brian Humphrey said the assessment by the L.A. Fire Department found no casualties, no serious injuries and little structural damage. Deputies from the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department’s Lennox station said the quake was quite powerful but didn’t last more than 10 seconds and that so far there were no reports of major damage. The authorities checked all critical facilities for damage and made sure everything was in order.

KCAL-TV Channel 9 was the first to interview some people at shopping mall in Redondo Beach who said the seism shook the screen and made some tiles to fall but overall there were no major damage or injuries. KCAL also said there were reports of quite a few alarms going off and some people were cut by the broken glass. In Hawthorne, firefighters rushed to Chadron Avenue, because a light pole was damaged during the quake. Apparently one man suffered a heart attack but the exact causes are yet to be discovered so it may not be related to the earthquake.

U.S. Geological Survey seismologist Susan Hough said the seism occurred a bit deep, at 8.4 miles from the surface and that this kind of quake is felt smoother and less motion is created. Lucy Jones, seismologist at the U.S. Geological Survey, claims the quake was the result of a rupture on the Newport-Inglewood fault, which apparently isn’t capable of a larger, stronger quake, like the San Andreas fault can be. Nevertheless, it was responsible for the 1933 Long Beach seism which shook the ground at a 6.3 magnitude. Jones also said that this is an active fault, numerous magnitude 3s being reported over the years and mostly in 1980s. At first, the seism magnitude was registered as a 5 by automatic sensors but further research showed a 4.7 magnitude. It was followed by a 3.1 quake just 6 minutes later but again but major damage or injuries. Although the seism was of a lower magnitude, over 12,000 people reported feeling the quake as it struck near an inhabited area.

No related posts.

, ,

42 Responses to “4.7 earthquake creates tension across Southern California”

  1. manuel
    May 18, 2009 at 3:21 pm #

    the earthquake was a 5.0 not a 4.7…just thought you know

    • Anonymous
      May 18, 2009 at 3:29 pm #

      no it wasnt it was a 4.7

      • me
        May 18, 2009 at 4:13 pm #

        none of u r right it was a 10.7 earthquake!!!!!

      • manuel
        May 18, 2009 at 5:51 pm #

        who is this..?I witnessed it myself

    • smiley
      May 18, 2009 at 9:30 pm #

      are you 7th grade manuel ortega?? if you are u have your x’s computer a grade older and no not ysel

  2. erick
    May 18, 2009 at 3:28 pm #

    the earthquake had a magnitude of a 5.0 really i thought people on the internet were smart

    • manuel
      May 18, 2009 at 3:31 pm #

      yes… i believe you are right… and yes i thought you three were smart…

      • me
        May 18, 2009 at 4:18 pm #

        ur soooooooooooooooooooooo stupid!!!!

    • mko
      May 18, 2009 at 5:56 pm #

      When you say smart, do you mean they actually READ the whole article and see where it says:

      At first, the seism magnitude was registered as a 5 by automatic sensors but further research showed a 4.7 magnitude

  3. edwin
    May 18, 2009 at 3:30 pm #

    it waas a 4.7

    • escada
      May 18, 2009 at 4:10 pm #

      it was 4.7

    • THEalien
      May 18, 2009 at 4:23 pm #

      u think your so smart dont u you little fag!

  4. me
    May 18, 2009 at 4:14 pm #

    your all a bunch of losers!!!!

  5. Karen
    May 18, 2009 at 4:15 pm #

    it was 4.7

  6. tc
    May 18, 2009 at 4:16 pm #

    you r wrong it is a 4.7 drrr

  7. somemysteriousperson
    May 18, 2009 at 4:21 pm #

    you all suckk stupid nerds!!!!

  8. donovan
    May 18, 2009 at 4:22 pm #

    your article is cool about the earthquake becuse its sometimes fun for me unless it is really bad

  9. donovan
    May 18, 2009 at 4:24 pm #

    idk what to say about it any more

  10. orlando
    May 18, 2009 at 4:26 pm #

    it was a 4.7

  11. yo mama
    May 18, 2009 at 4:32 pm #

    it was a final 4.7

  12. george
    May 18, 2009 at 4:37 pm #

    It was an 5.0 because people felt it in San Deigo.

  13. george
    May 18, 2009 at 4:40 pm #

    It was an 5.0

  14. Anonymous
    May 18, 2009 at 5:31 pm #

    What difference does it make. It was strong enough that we felt it in Fontana

  15. Tonya
    May 18, 2009 at 5:32 pm #

    What difference does it make. It was strong enough that we felt it in Fontana

    • smiley
      May 18, 2009 at 9:18 pm #

      it does matter if u felt it in Fontana !!!!!!!!!!!!

  16. manuel
    May 18, 2009 at 9:13 pm #

    it happend on my birthday…

  17. Chelsea
    May 18, 2009 at 9:14 pm #

    yeah it was strong thats all that matters but to be clear it was a 5.0

  18. LA fLaca
    May 18, 2009 at 9:14 pm #

    hahaHAhA I MADe iT HApPEN

  19. smiley
    May 18, 2009 at 9:15 pm #

    if they say it was a 4.7 then they should be right!!!!

  20. smiley
    May 18, 2009 at 9:16 pm #

    you are all a bunch of fags!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!xD

  21. 123456789
    May 18, 2009 at 9:20 pm #

    whas on my birthday

  22. joy5001
    May 18, 2009 at 9:22 pm #

    it was a 5.0 drr stupid!!!

  23. maxy3d
    May 18, 2009 at 9:26 pm #

    stupid!!!!!!!!!! bitches!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  24. Anonymous
    May 18, 2009 at 9:27 pm #

    it was a 5.0

  25. SKYLER
    May 18, 2009 at 9:29 pm #

    DAMM I THOUGHT I WAS GANNA DIE WEN IT HAPPENED I HAD TO HIDE UNDER DA TABLE CUZ I WASS SO SCARED

  26. Anonymous
    May 18, 2009 at 9:32 pm #

    it was a 5.0 because they saw that later it was a 5.0 not a 4.7 this article is not accurate!

  27. badmeme
    May 19, 2009 at 12:53 am #

    it was over 9000 baddies

  28. laughingassoff
    May 19, 2009 at 3:12 pm #

    um why you arguing over 4.7 or 5 like it matters ffs
    i bet it was a 5.1 and the equipment is faulty
    may the earth open up and swallow some of you morons lol

  29. Bebeshka
    October 17, 2009 at 3:19 pm #

    ?????! ?????? ?? ???? ?????? ??? ????? ??????????? ????? :)

  30. ??????
    October 18, 2009 at 11:46 am #

    ???, ?????????, ??????????, ? ?? ? ???? ?? ?? ?????? ?????? ? ????, ??? ????

  31. ??????
    December 28, 2009 at 3:54 am #

    ??? ????????????? ????? ???????, ??? ???? ???? ??????? ?? ??? 100 ?????????. :)

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Another Earthquake In Chile; No Tsunami Alert Yet! | Fried Post - January 3, 2011

    [...] earthquake comes after the big one that happened in February 2010 when Chile was hit by another earthquake that [...]

Leave a Reply

Leave your opinion here. Please be nice. Your Email address will be kept private.